Home --> Archive --> Car Corner Archive --> Car Corner January 2008
|
|
|
|
Car Corner
Electronic-Turbo for maximum fuel economy
January 1, 2008
By Scott Lewis
A few years ago I talked about an idea I had for a
Continuously Variable Boost Supercharger.
This month I have a new idea for an electronically controlled
turbocharger, the Electronic-Turbo.
What is different about the Electronic-Turbo from the Continuously
Variable Boost Supercharger is that everything (and I mean
everything) needed to create this system exists and is in use
today in many cars. They just haven't been put together like this.
Most cars use turbocharging to increase horsepower. For those of you
that don't know what turbocharging is... a turbocharger (or turbo) is
basically two propellers on a single shaft separated by a housing. One
side of the propellers has the exhaust pumped into it. This spins the
turbo. The other side is connected to the incoming air supply of the
engine. When the exhaust gasses spin the turbo it forces the incoming
air into the engine. This forced air is the boost, hence the term
turbo-boost. By forcing more air into the engine you allow the engine to
burn more fuel (fuel will not burn without air). More fuel to burn means
more power.
Turbocharging cars has been done mostly for performance, you have heard
of the Porsche 911 Turbo, right? But it is also done on economy cars
such as the VW Turbo Diesel Golf/Rabbit or whatever they call it today.
The economy idea comes from the theory that you can fit a car with a
smaller engine to get better gas mileage and the turbocharger will
provide the power of a larger engine.
And this works. However, the problem with this is that you can't turn
the turbocharger off. If you keep driving your turbo car like a Mario
Andretti you are going to be forcing all that air into it, and the
on-board computer is going to be supplying the appropriate fuel. So you
don't get as much benefit as you would like.
Let's look at an apples to apples comparison. My beloved Mini Cooper is
already outdated. They have change from using a supercharger (driven by
a belt as opposed to exhaust gases) to a turbocharger for the Mini
Cooper S. This gives us a great chance to compare two nearly identical
vehicles with and without a turbocharger.
The 2007 Mini Cooper has a 1.6 liter engine that puts out 120 hp. The
2007 Mini Cooper S has a turbocharged 1.6 liter engine that puts out 172
hp. The EPA rates the Mini Cooper with 30/40 mpg city/highway, and rates
the Mini Cooper S with 27/36 mpg. The turbo in the S model costs you 4
mpg on the highway. Wait a minute. On the highway, in normal driving
condition, you are mostly going at a steady speed. It is no trouble for
all cars to maintain a speed within approximately 5 mph of the speed
limit, well maybe not the Smart.
So why doesn't the turbocharged S get the same highway mileage? Simple,
at 3000 RPM on the highway you are going to be generating boost, and
with that boost comes extra fuel. You have to maintain the air/fuel
ratio for your engine to run properly.
The question them becomes, why can't we eliminate the boost from the
turbocharger when we are cruising on the highway at a steady state?
I think we can. Now we are going to mention all the pieces of technology
that already exists to make the Electronic-Turbo work. For starters I
need to explain what a wastegate is. A wastegate is a device used on
almost all turbocharged applications (in production vehicles anyway).
This device sits between the exhaust and the turbocharger. The exhaust
goes through it before the turbocharger. The wastegate will bypass the
turbocharger when the amount of boost the turbo provides reaches a
certain limit. This is how you prevent the turbo from supplying
unlimited boost and blowing your engine through the hood of your car.
Most cars with turbos have an electronically controlled wastegate. Many
aftermarket tuners will adjust the amount of boost the turbo will make
before the wastegate kicks in. For instance, let's say a production car
has a turbo and the computer opens the wastegate a 11 p.s.i. of boost.
You add an aftermarket programming device to tell the on-board computer
to open the wastegate at 15 p.s.i. of boost. As long as the computer
provides the appropriate extra fuel to go with that 4 extra pounds of
boost you will get an increase in horsepower. Granted, you can only
increase boost so much before you put too much strain on the engine and
disaster strikes.
How will this help us with mileage? Why couldn't we program the computer
to open the wastegate all the way, in essence creating no boost
at all, when driving on the highway at a
steady state. This is no different than the programming the aftermarket
does today, just with different results. Then we should be able to match
the highway mileage of the non-turbo car. There may be a slight lose of
efficiency in the exhaust plumbing of the turbo car that may cost us 1
mpg over the non turbo car. Beyond that all should be possible.
Of course, you would not have the passing power on the highway this
way. So we need a way to get back that power. I have two possibilities.
First is to program the computer to turn off the wastegate when you
press down on the throttle. This would not be any different than when an
electric hybrid kicks in its electric motor to assist its gasoline
companion.
However, the better approach would be to put it on a switch. Some cars
have adjustable suspensions. You set a switch in the passenger
compartment to sport, normal and/or luxury. On sport the suspension is
tightened up to provide crisper handling. On luxury the opposite happens
to provide a more pleasant ride.
Our Electronic-Turbo car would have performance and economy labels.
Under economy the wastegate would bypass the turbocharger all the time,
providing no boost. Without the boost we should get
very close to the fuel economy of the non-turbo car all the time. When
we need the extra power we simply flip the switch to performance and we
have all the power the turbo normally provides and the accompanying loss
in mileage.
BMW puts just such a switch in its M5 super sedan. The switch in its
normal position allows the engine to provide 400 hp. Flip the switch and
suddenly you have 500 hp on tap. If they can go from 400 to 500
horsepower at the flip of a switch, why can't they go from 120 to 172 hp
with the same switch. What's really cool about this idea is that it
would cost almost nothing. You add a switch to the car that cost about a
$1 and you just have to spend the time to program the computer to open
the wastegate and adjust the fuel curve. Simple.
I want one. This is one of those ideas that is sorely missing in the age
of imported oil and gas prices over $3/gal. Every turbocharged car could
be equipped with this for a few dollars and people would have the option
to get better gas mileage or better performance on demand. I rarely use
the full power of my Mini Cooper S' supercharger. Traffic and those
pesky police won't let me. So why shouldn't I get the advantage of the
cheaper, non-turbocharged car when I want it.
Conclusion
Well, there is another one of those great ideas I just need funding to
make happen. What bothers me is that nobody has had this idea before. It
seems pretty simple to use modern technology that is already in use to
go that extra mile... or should I say that extra mile per gallon.
I guess I will just have to wait until I win the lottery to make this
happen myself. Along with the Continuously
Variable Boost Supercharger, and the right
way to build a hybrid.